synapticjava (
synapticjava) wrote2005-04-03 10:49 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Well that was dumb.
Just finished Bartleby the Scrivener. Boy, that was dumb. No actual conclusion, and just a guy that won't leave? Am I missing something? And dead letters? Mental note: Kick Williams on Tuesday.
no subject
YES YES OH MY GOSH YOU'RE MISSING SO MUCH BEST SHORT STORY IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE HATING BARTLEBY DOES NOT COMPUTE DOES NOT COMPUTE BRAIN ESSPLODE--*pop*
I certainly hope Williams tells you guys about how and why Melville wrote this. I promise it's not dumb or pointless.
And dead letters are letters that can't get where they're supposed to go. (Wrong address or whatever.) Bartleby's job was destroying thwarted correspondence.
I totally blame Williams for this. Without context, it's a puzzling story. (Sorry; I read it the first time with Wiliams in the American novel class, and then I had it last quarter with American Lit Goddess Lucy Rinehart, and I assure you it's good.)
Ah, Bartleby! Ah, humanity!
</english major>
Your icon makes me giggle, by the way.
no subject
*puts your brain back together*
I knew what dead letters are (courtesy of Beetlejuice, the cartoon), but I'm missing too much of the puzzle, I think. Maybe I didn't read it correctly?
Maybe I'll go google it or something.
no subject
i dunno. i could try to explain it the way it was explained to me, but id just blunder along like a fool. though if even after explaination, you dont like it, feel free to kick me until you feel better.
no subject
The thing about "Bartleby" is to not try to figure out exactly what Bartleby means; anyone who says they understand his motivation is a liar.
no subject
no subject