synapticjava (
synapticjava) wrote2005-04-03 10:49 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Well that was dumb.
Just finished Bartleby the Scrivener. Boy, that was dumb. No actual conclusion, and just a guy that won't leave? Am I missing something? And dead letters? Mental note: Kick Williams on Tuesday.
no subject
YES YES OH MY GOSH YOU'RE MISSING SO MUCH BEST SHORT STORY IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE HATING BARTLEBY DOES NOT COMPUTE DOES NOT COMPUTE BRAIN ESSPLODE--*pop*
I certainly hope Williams tells you guys about how and why Melville wrote this. I promise it's not dumb or pointless.
And dead letters are letters that can't get where they're supposed to go. (Wrong address or whatever.) Bartleby's job was destroying thwarted correspondence.
I totally blame Williams for this. Without context, it's a puzzling story. (Sorry; I read it the first time with Wiliams in the American novel class, and then I had it last quarter with American Lit Goddess Lucy Rinehart, and I assure you it's good.)
Ah, Bartleby! Ah, humanity!
</english major>
Your icon makes me giggle, by the way.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)